General considerations:
Other considerations specified by biomimetic robot fabrication
Possible material combination matrix for
polymer SDM
|
|
|
Thermoset Part Material |
Category A
Part: SLA resin Support: Solder Mask |
Category
B
Part: Polyurethane or Epoxy Support: Wax |
Thermoplastic Part Material |
Category C
Part: Wax Support: Solder Mask |
Category D
Part: Polycarbonate or Filled Wax Support: ACR200 |
Category A: Thermoset materials must be highly crosslinked than the support materials so that the support materials will be removable via solvents which will not harm the part materials. The only major SDM combination from this category is acrylate Stereolithography resin part material with solder mask support material.
Category B: The material combinations from this category is currently used for making biomimetic robot legs. Thermoplastic support materials can be removed by heating or heated solvents, since thermoset part materials will not melt when heated. If thermoset part materials cure exothermically, however, their heats of polymerization must not cause thermoplastic support materials to melt or flow. SDM material combinations in this category include polyurethane or epoxy part materials and wax support materials. Heat resistance of support materials limites the cure speed of part materials since fast-curing part materials may generate enough heat to melt support materials. Therefore, most of the SDM thermoset part materials in this category cure at intermediate speeds. However, these part materials tend to have low heat resistance, making them soften at the deposition temperatures required by the support materials. This can weaken parts during construction, leading to greater distortion.
Category C: Thermoset support materials must be chosen so that
heat generated during curing does not melt thermoplastic part materials.
Support materials must also be chosen to have sufficient heat resistance
to withstand the deposition of hot, liquid thermoplatic part materials.
Category D: This is a difficult combination to develop because of the different temperature requirements for adhesion and geometry preservation.
Material combinations experimented at Stanford
University with promising results:
|
|
|
|
|
UV-curable part + water solvable support | Somos 2100 Acrylate Stereolithography resin | Solder mask | Complete removal by water | Reduced process cycle time
Insufficient strength |
Castable thermoset part + chemically solvable support | LUC-4180 Polyurethane | Protowax | Partial removal by melting,
complete removal by
BIOACT 280 |
Adequate strength, good toughness, performance was limited by available support materials, long curing time, relatively poor interlayer strength |
Castable Epoxy part + wax support | Ciba TDT205-3 Epoxy | KC3230A Protowax | Complete removal by BIOACT280 | Rapid cure speed, successive layers can be machined two hours after casting |
Castable Epoxy part + wax support | ADTECH EE-501/530 Epoxy | Protowax | Complete removal by BIOACT 280 | Strongest material for multilayer structure, long curing time (24hrs), increased process difficulty |
Castable Polyurathene part + different wax supports | IE-50A, IE-90A, IE-65DC, IE-70DC polyurathene | Blue wax,
Red wax, green wax |
Blue wax is removed by machining, red wax is removed by heating, green wax is removed by water | Good combination for making graded material parts. Bubbles exist when embedding components. IE-50A is too soft to machine. IE-90A can be faced, but not good for contouring |
Back to Material Home SDM Tutorial Biomimetic Robotics Home CDR Home Stanford University
Last updated: 11/22/1999