See also:
http://cdr.stanford.edu/~baileys/WWWfiles/queue1.pdf
http://cdr.stanford.edu/~baileys/WWWfiles/bigpic1.pdf
Prioritized list of things to do
1 - Fix Sprawl (first since a one-shot
item)
- servo replaced
- kickback diodes
- PIC installation (sig. amt. of work)
- buy and install parallel springs in legs
Rationale
- prerequisite for #2
2 - Sprawl measurements
- given leg angles and stride frequency
- quantitatively measure velocities
- qualitatively measure disturbance rejection
Rationale
- See if we can get it to walk better
- Try out some biomimetic ideas (footplacement, timing,
equilibrium position regulation, variable stiffness torsional
joints, mass distribution relative to hips)
3 - Explore limit cycles
- test equilibrium finder for 2D model with given initial geometry
- discuss limit cycle production thru state switching w/ Tomlin
- look at cockroach trajectory and tripod switching
Rationale
- See if there is a similarity between the cockroach body
trajectory/leg duty cycles and stable variable state systems.
(These are systems that maintain a limit cycle or converge to an
equilibrium point by changing their state equations at different
locations in the phase plane. In terms of mobile systems, feet
touch or lift off the ground, thus changing the state equations.
- Want to see if we can design a legged system with compliance
(or "complex stiffness") that will yield the same types of
stable non-linear behavior
4 - Look closely at Full's mechanical properties
results
- characterize into a set of tradition components (springs,
dampers, etc)
- Can our plastics replicate these properties?
AND
4 - Build tiny SDM leg to test with Dudek/Meier
setup at Berkeley
Rationale
- The Dudek/Meier setup in Berkeley is experimental apparatus that
allows them to make mechanical properties measurements on
cockroach legs. Outside of their community, the testing setup
and results are not well understood. At the least, a common
frame of reference will be established (fundamental part of the
MURI).
- We also want to see how our engineering materials (ie plastics)
behave in terms of mechanical properties. Static evaluations
are easy, but they seem to be doing more interesting dynamic
evaluations. In turn, this will lead to us being able to
engineer the mechanical properties we want into our parts.
5 - Install big servos on sprawl, torsionally
compliant hips
- vary stiffness of torsional springs
Rationale
- Almost a detail issue under #1, but heavier time commitment.
- Also, it would be nice if the compliant part of the hip was an
SDM component (plastic) rather than tradition spring and
bearings....
6 - Tuned/Variable compliance hip in SDM
Rationale
- Way down the road at this point - we need to have a better idea
of what we want and can achieve (which should be facilitated by
the previous items
6 - Complete 2D model with event checker
- can deal with foot contact, switching tripods
- matlab's checker is not robust enough - too much time wasted
- make our own integrator
Rationale
- test bed for ideas about mechanical properties and
configurations
- Useful if it takes less time than actually building the device
7 - Mini-Sprawl - small version of the
big Sprawl
- mouse-sized version of Sprawl built in SDM
Rationale
- Identify issues with making very small and complex SDM'ed parts